Score a Robotics Company Across Six Dimensions
The pitch promises a hexagon. Diligence finds a polygon. The space between is where most robotics losses live.
Score a real company
TRL 7 (system prototype demo)
Near breakeven
1,000–10,000 hours
Balanced R&D + engineering
PASS UNLESS YOU'RE EARLY-STAGE
Early stage with significant risk at 2.4/5. Start the conversation at Unit Economics (2/5): if they cannot answer that one cleanly, the rest is decoration.
What to take away
- 01A lopsided radar where technology readiness scores 5 and integration maturity scores 1 is a recurring warning sign; demos routinely obscure thin field experience and weak unit economics.
- 02Unit economics and integration maturity predict commercial success most reliably; a company scoring 4+ on both can survive weakness elsewhere.
- 03Technology Readiness Level (TRL) anchors: TRL 7 requires 1 to 3 paying field pilots; TRL 8 needs 5+ customer sites; TRL 9 requires 50+ deployments with a proven service and support motion.
- 04Field-hour totals without intervention-rate context mislead; 50,000 hours with one human intervention per hour is less mature than 10,000 hours with one every twenty.
Ark Invest's 2025 robotics tracker shows that 6 of every 10 robotics failures trace back to integration maturity and unit economics, not technical readiness. Pitch decks are engineered to obscure that ratio. The companies that excite investors most, with sharp demos and bold technical claims, routinely score poorly on the dimensions that predict commercial success. A six-axis radar forces the conversation onto exactly those dimensions: the shape of the polygon is harder to fake than any single axis.
This interactive scores a company across six dimensions (technology readiness, unit economics, integration maturity, team composition, market timing, and defensibility), each on a 1-to-5 scale with transparent anchors. The dashed reference polygon underneath is the "common pitch" shape every deck claims. As you score, magenta arrows mark every axis where your polygon contracts away from that reference: the gap between deck and diligence, visualized. A preset row above the sliders loads analyst reads of five real humanoid companies as of early 2026 (1X Technologies, Figure AI, Apptronik, Agility Robotics, and Boston Dynamics) so a cold reader can calibrate against actual firms instead of abstract bands.
Anchors come from the Association for Advancing Automation's 2024 due-diligence framework, from Technology Readiness Level (TRL) definitions adapted to robotics (International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 16290 plus field adjustments), and from venture-capital diligence notes on robotics rounds in 2024-2025. Unit-economics bands calibrate against Ark Invest's robotics gross-margin tracking. Integration-maturity field-hour thresholds come from the same intervention-rate curves Universal Robots uses to characterize customer deployments. Preset company scores are one analyst's read of public signals (BMW Leipzig pilots, Mercedes paid trials, Amazon and GXO deployments, the October 2025 NEO teleoperation reveal); they are educational calibration points, not endorsements.
Start with the preset row at the top of the interactive. Click 1X Technologies first and notice how the polygon hugs the dashed pitch line; click Boston Dynamics and watch the same six axes expand past the reference. Then switch a real company you have seen this quarter into the sliders and pay attention to the magenta arrows. The verdict line below the chart is not a valuation; it is an instruction. If a founder cannot answer cleanly to the weakest axis the radar identifies, the rest of the pitch is decoration.
tee-ix-int-13-01-20260419-74f2af
Miller, J. (2026). Score a Robotics Company Across Six Dimensions [Interactive]. Interactives, The End Effector. https://endeff.com/ix/int-13-01 (tee-ix-int-13-01-20260419-74f2af)
Referenced in
Revision history · 2
- Apr 24, 2026
tee-ix-int-13-01-20260424-4f57c3Narrative lint — voice, specificity, structure.
- Apr 19, 2026
tee-ix-int-13-01-20260419-74f2afInitial editorial draft.
Originally published alongside Core Robotics

